Climate Engineering Or Space Solar Power Which is the Better Option?

Obama looks at climate engineering

The president’s new science adviser said Wednesday that global warming is so dire, the Obama administration is discussing radical technologies to cool Earth’s air. John Holdren told The Associated Press in his first interview since being confirmed last month that the idea of geoengineering the climate is being discussed.

One such extreme option includes shooting pollution particles into the upper atmosphere to reflect the sun’s rays. Holdren said such an experimental measure would only be used as a last resort.

“It’s got to be looked at,” he said. “We don’t have the luxury of taking any approach off the table.”

I have seen several comments to this article suggesting that Space Solar Power would be a far cheaper solution. I have to agree. Also Space Solar Power would be far safer. Once you put stuff into the atmosphere it is hard to get it back.

If the government is so worried about global warming that they are even considering climate engineering then the government should be funding development and construction of Solar Power Satellites and lunar construction facilities for Solar Power Satellites. Regardless of the business case or cost of the power since Space Solar Power would have a lower net cost (cost of construction and operation minus profit from power sold) and would be far safer than climate engineering.

The US could easily significantly reduce world wide carbon emissions if we beamed low cost carbon free power to the entire globe. We have the technology. The only question is do we have the will?


Picture of admin


Contributors to the NSS Blog are unpaid volunteers. Unless specifically labeled an NSS position or press release, all blog posts represent the views of the author and not of NSS, even if written by an NSS officer.

2 thoughts on “Climate Engineering Or Space Solar Power Which is the Better Option?”

  1. I like the topic except it's a false dichotomy as it stands. I believe we need both of these and they don't compete. Terra's longterm carrying capacity might amount to half a billion humans; it's pushing 7 billion humans. Somehow or other, that's going to change; and space offers options both for change and for our species survival if thru some accident we lose Terra.

    Space solar power is nonpolluting and comes with option to size it to immensity nearly unimaginable today. Thinking of climate engineering, I recall the Moties who reconstructed their ships at need in flight: we aren't Moties and I feel insecure to even think of re-engineering our climate as it runs. Given space solar power then we can lower the stake on the local climate re-engineering, and so these two are not competitors, they are synergistically complementary and we need them both.

    Titeotwawki — Martha Adams 2009 Apr 22

  2. a false dilemma perhaps but what if…

    Climate engineering seems like a scary topic and Space solar power can easily be taken advantage of just like our usage of oil. They are synergistically complementary and we do need them both but there has to be some sort of equilibrium calculated before development can occur. It is so hard too find a balance but it can be done.


Leave a Comment

future 1

Don't Miss a Beat!

Be the first to know when new articles are posted!

Follow Us On Social Media


Give The Gift Of Space: Membership For Friends and Family

Book Review


ISDC 2024:

International Space Development Conference May 23rd-26th, 2024


Image of Kalpana One space settlement courtesy Bryan Versteeg, $32,000 in Cash Awards Given for Best Space-Related Business Plans — Deadline March 1, 2024

Category: Nonfiction Reviewed by: John J. Vester Title: Nuclear Rockets: To the Moon and Mars Author: Manfred “Dutch” von Ehrenfried Format: Paperback/Kindle Pages: 270 Publisher:

Partially Successful Flight Reached Space and Demonstrated New “Hot Staging” System The National Space Society congratulates SpaceX on the second test of its Starship/Super Heavy

Ad Astra, the NSS quarterly print, digital, and audio magazine, has won a 2023 MARCOM Gold Award. The awards are given yearly for “Excellence in

By Jennifer Muntz, NSS Member Coordinator On October 10th, an inspiring breakfast event took flight at the Center for Space Education at the Kennedy Space

By Grant Henriksen NSS Policy Committee Benefit sharing is a concept that refers to the distribution of benefits derived from the exploration and use of

People residing and working in space, space settlements, or on long-duration space flights will need to produce infrastructures and food to maintain healthy lifestyles. The

Image: Artist’s concept of the Blue Moon lander. Credit: Blue Origin. Second Human Landing System Contract Encourages Competition and Innovation The National Space Society congratulates