Table of Contents

APPENDIX A

SPACE COLONIZATION COST PARAMETRICS

The simple, analytic expression used for estimating the costs of space colonization versus time is particularly useful as an aid in observing the effects upon costs due to variations in the system parameters. Moreover, it is formulated on a rate basis so that the results can be scaled as the technologies or strategies of colonization change. However, the equation cannot be used indiscriminately without regard to several precautions. The equation only models the system costs, giving approximate results. When the cost equation is placed on a rate basis it is assumed that the system costs scale linearly. To simplify the equation, a number of terms which were thought to be negligible or too difficult to formulate were omitted, hence the results are too low. The 20 percent overhead charges were explicitly omitted. Finally, it is not easy to include parameters which change from year to year during the colony build up. In spite of these shortcomings, this equation is quite useful as a means of sensing cost trends which accompany changes in system parameters.

The major cost factors include research and development (R&D), production, transportation, and crew costs for the L5 and lunar facilities. The other costs in the system have been neglected. An analysis of the R&D and production costs shows them to be relatively independent of modest variations in size. Data from table 6-9 show these costs to be $28.5 X 10^9 and $14.6 X 10^9, respectively, for a total of $43.1 10^9. Transportation costs to L5 and the Moon are expressed as

where all parameters of the system are defined and evaluated for the baseline system in table 6-10.

TABLE 6-10 (gif format)

TABLE 6-10.- PARAMETERS OF THE COST EQUATION
Symbol Units Definition Baseline
magnitude
M5 kg Mass of Al in L5 habitat 5X10^8
O kg/kg/yr Ratio of L5 plant output/yr to plant mass 8.3
E5 kg/kW Specific mass of L5 power plant 14
K5 kW/kg/yr Power required per unit mass of Al produced at L5 2.2X10^-3
W5 kg/person-yr Productivity of L5 workers 46X10^3
F5 yr^-1 Crew rotation rate for workers at L5 1
H5 kg/person Mass of L5 construction shack/person 5X10^3
D5 $/kg Launch costs to L5 800
R kg/person-yr Re-supply rate for workers 1.7X10^3
Mm kg Mass to be launched from Moon 1.2X10^10
Lm kg/kg/yr Ratio of launcher mass to mass launch rate 4.6X10^-3
Em kg/kW Specific mass of lunar power plant 45
Km kW/kg/yr Power required per unit mass launched from Moon 2X10^-4
Hm kg/person Mass of lunar crew habitat/person 7X10^3
Fm yr^-1 Crew rotation rate for workers at Moon 0.5
Nm persons Number of crew on Moon 150
Dm $/kg Launch costs to Moon 1600
Y yr Duration of the project - 8 yr ---

Note - Y is not the duration of the project, but 8 yr less.

Similarly, the crew costs are given as

When these results are added together, the total cost in 1975 dollars is obtained as

When the baseline values of the parameters from table 6-10 are substituted into eq. (5), the result is

These results are shown in figure 6-7. To demonstrate the use of the cost equation, two additional examples are also shown in the figure. In the first, a more advanced transportation system is considered which has $9 X 10^9 additional development costs, but which reduces the launch costs per kg to L5 and the Moon to $200 and $400, respectively. The cost equation for this case is

In the second, a solar power source, instead of the nuclear source, is used on the Moon with a resulting cost equation of

Note that in the second case, this change is merely a convenient one for showing the use of eq. (5) and does not consider any of the related technical problems.

Specific ideas to optimize the system include:

  1. Major transportation vehicles to the Moon should not be returned until oxygen is available to reduce costs.
  2. The interorbital transfer vehicle (IOTV) could be powered by a solar electric power source and ion or mass driver thrusters.
  3. The lunar soil could be pre-processed on the Moon by magnetic separation.
  4. Major structural elements and shell may be built by vapor deposition.
  5. The colony site may be optimized by shortening either the lines of supply or the lines to ultimate usage site (geosynchronous orbit).
  6. Better transportation vehicles to LEO would be very advantageous. A single stage to orbit, completely reusable, vehicle is desirable.
  7. All wastes from the L5 construction crews could be stored for recycling to offset losses of colony gases, carbon and water.
  8. The torus can be shielded in stages by separate segments of complete thickness shielding for some groups of colonists to move in before the whole torus is shielded.
  9. The throughput of the lunar mass drivers can be increased by providing additional power from a lunar satellite solar power station (probably at Ll, and using a shorter microwave wavelength from that used by the geosynchronous version).
  10. The labor intensive industrial operations as presently employed on Earth can be more fully automated to reduce costs of the large labor force at L5.
  11. The usual administrative functions can be provided by people remaining on Earth.
  12. Construction of agricultural facilities at LEO for providing food and for testing.
Return to Chapter 6

Table of Contents

Curator: Al Globus
If you find any errors on this page contact Al Globus. 		Space Settlement hompage

This site was hosted by the NASA Ames Research Center from 1994-2018 and is now hosted by:

National Space Society